AI Zone Admin Forum Add your forum

NEWS: Chatbots.org survey on 3000 US and UK consumers shows it is time for chatbot integration in customer service!read more..

Some issues
 
 
  [ # 16 ]

Hi

guys have a question as well :

in which way the construction grammar related to dialogue generation ?? 

still dnt get it !! can anyone upload any to help me in that ??

 

 

 
  [ # 17 ]

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/bibliography/google-scholar/construction-grammar-dialog-systems

It seems to me that “grammar parsing” is involved with the *de-construction* of natural language; so, how is natural language *re-constructed* or “generated” from parsed grammar ?!?  And, what are examples of a tools or systems that do this ?!?

 

 
  [ # 18 ]

I’m just finding it hard to believe that all “grammar parsing” dialog systems (grammar agents) depend on machine learning to generate natural language responses….

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/bibliography/google-scholar/rule-learning-dialog-systems

Is it correct that “decision trees” are generated by “rule learning systems”?

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/bibliography/google-scholar/learning-classifier-dialog-systems

And, are “rule learning systems” not otherwise known as “learning classifier systems”?

 

 
  [ # 19 ]

> http://books.google.com/books?id=r3OTcQo3C7QC

Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Dialogue Systems: A Data-driven Methodology for Dialogue Management and Natural Language Generation (2011)

File Attachments
 

 
  [ # 20 ]

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/bibliography/google-scholar/classifier-dialog-systems-2011

I looked at 365x academic papers from 2011 about dialog systems mentioning “classifier” (above).

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/machine-learning/classifiers-in-dialog-systems

From those 2011 papers, I manually extracted some 122x classifier terms, or “types” of classifier (above).  I then scored those classifier types for “popularity” against the past 10 years of papers in Google Scholar (above).

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/machine-learning/classification-algorithms-in-dialog-systems

Then I took the whole “Category:Classification_algorithms” from Wikipedia (circa 125x) and scored those for popularity against the past 10 years of papers in Google Scholar (above).

> http://www.meta-guide.com/home/machine-learning/best-dialog-system-classifiers

Looking at the top dozen from both lists, I created a new Meta Guide webpage, “Best Dialog System Classifiers” (above).

= = =

It is still not clear to me whether or not all or most grammar based (grammar parsing) dialog systems (grammar agents) necessarily require machine learning and/or classifiers in order to generate natural language responses ?!?

What is more clear to me is that I now suspect that the “learning classifiers” create the so-called “language model” that the dialog system uses to “map” replies….

For instance, three forms of feature may be incorporated into the classifier: part-of-speech (POS) tags, lexical features, and syntactic properties.

The classification function can be defined in several ways: a multi-nomial naive Bayes classifier, a n-gram based classifier, a classifier based on grammatical inference techniques, or a classifier based on neural networks.

Basically, classifiers may be statistical or rule-based.

 

 < 1 2
2 of 2
 
  login or register to react